"Don't Think Twice, It's All Right"
6.30.2009
Sky Open Wide
5.30.2009
Courtroom Theology
June, Ellie
Mr. Summers
English 11 H
21 May 2009
Don't Thoughts Exist To Contradict?
the⋅ol⋅o⋅gy [thee-ol-uh-jee]
–noun, plural -gies.
1. the field of study and analysis that treats of God and of God's attributes and relations to the universe; study of divine things or religious truth; divinity.
2. Originally applying to only Christianity
Religion is steadily versatile. No longer is mankind constrained to the pillars of monotheism; for, the guidelines of morality are now subjective from soul to soul. Throughout the year, we have, together, insecurely and steadily studied authors with challenging theologies with both valid and believable arguments. The world is a courtroom; however, we are not attorneys with duties to convince and convict. Instead, we are jurors, placed to empathize with our convicted prophets, who so tirelessly claim their integrity.
With the genesis of our literary explorations, we began interpreting the works of Puritan, literary geniuses such as Anne Hutchinson and John Edwards. The two took the monotheistic approach to spirituality, claiming that not only that there is undoubtedly a god, but God, himself, predetermines his followers' loyalty.
“I have been guilty of wrong thinking,” confessed Hutchinson, expressing her traditional Puritan theology of man's conviction and inherent corruption. In her eyes, man's inferiority to the Lord allows Him to debase us which indirectly glorifies him through which we finally feel the truest of joy.
Venturing into the vast lands of Romanticism, we came across Nathaniel Hawthorne, the dreamiest of them all. As the godfather of natural poetic surreality, Hawthorne advocates a life far from civilization, one entwined within the vines of April. The most interesting aspect of a Romantic lifestyle is its versatility. Sure, most Romantics seem to prefer a Godless life, but devotion one would normally have for a supernatural being is, instead, used to glorify the Pines and Ferns.
In modern times, this faith would be dubbed as Pantheism, a doctrine that identifies God with the universe, meaning the world is a microcosm of the metaphysical body of God. At the same time, some Pantheists are strict Atheists, claiming only to worship the universe for the emotions rendered by its wholesome beauty. Emotion is the Romantic deity. “A pure man needs no glove to cover it,” Hawthorne once said. It is by intuition that man learns of himself. And if he, indeed, does adhere to the faint voice within his heart, he will never be faced with shame; for instinct never fails him.
Mark Twain preferred to nix the nonsense. Thus, commenced the era of Realism. Through characters like little Huckleberry Finn, Twain cleverly portrayed his apathy towards faith and his simplistic lifestyle. A counter to Monotheism—Atheism professes a theology that no type of supernatural or superior being exists.
“You can't pray a lie,” admitted Finn. If the action doesn't feel natural or render satisfaction, then its purpose is invalid. Prayer wasn't for him; however, he never once mocked the faithful. Rather, he let them do as they please.
Normally, I choose to remain pokerface; however, my religious beliefs (or lack thereof) is so radical from others surrounding me that it would be tedious not to give background. Raised in a culturally Islamic family, simultaneously in a religiously lax household, I was never preached to, insomuch that my parents frowned upon my Christian conformity a few years back. I attended a Catholic middle school against my will and found myself treading behind the pastors' daughters in faith. I devoted my life to Christ, prayed to Him relentlessly, and persuaded myself that He was my savior and one and only. Needless to say—things have changed.
To clarify a common misconception: Atheism is not Satanism. A person proclaiming disbelief in God does not directly connote that he is inherently evil or corrupt. How is he so sure the holy pages bound, he so preciously adheres to are steadfast? He can't.
I do not intend this monologue to be an opportunity for the reader to evangelize me. I respect all faiths entirely, I really do, but let's start by addressing that I am, indeed, a devout Agnostic, dedicating my life to good thoughts, good words, and good deeds. My theories of a god-like figure vary and I am content with my inconsistency. At the moment, I don't believe in God; however, ask me tomorrow, after I've experienced a surreal coincidence and I might contradict myself. I won't subscribe to the whole Atheistic cult, because really, who knows if there is a metaphysical being?
Bluntly stated--humans are ignorant for either stating complete and utter belief in an invisible creator and too full of themselves for denying blind faith. Why are we bound to choose one over the other? The human mind is far too insignificant. You will never comprehend the meaning of life. Your pastor is fatuously respected when he is only man-weak, stupid, selfish. “These liars warn't no kings nor dukes,” explained little Huck Finn, “...But just low-down humbugs and frauds.” Then again, the Atheist you met on the plane last week--he's nothing but a fraud who obstinately thinks he's deciphered the world's mystery. My doubt is my dogma.
In short, I wholeheartedly believe my purpose is to use my mind, hands, and energy to benefit this treasured world around me, to see as much as I can and if that means I will one day witness Jesus rise again, so be it. I'm sure he'd be just as satisfied with me.
5.11.2009
Welcome To My Sub-Reality
4.28.2009
Reach
4.01.2009
Such Impermissible Discontentment
“A knowledge of the existence of something we cannot penetrate, of the manifestations of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty - it is this knowledge and this emotion that constitute the truly religious attitude; in this sense, and this alone, I am a deeply religious man.”-Albert Einstein
Tell, me—why is mankind so enveloped with roaring curiosity? And how is the thirst for an answer quenched? You and I are human beings. We feel emotion, empathize towards one another, run, play, laugh, speak. Aside from mere relentlessness, what is the the purpose of divulging into a matter too perplexing to comprehend? Wallace Stevens sees no opportunity for the simple “Complacencies” of “Coffee and oranges” while concurrently burdened by what he calls an “Encroachment” of “that old catastrophe.”
Sunday Morning, a creed for the devout Atheist, renders the reader to feel debased, misled by rituals she has been beseeched to practice. However, she is reintroduced to a reverent “divinity,” she used to call God, now the “beauty of the earth.” Stevens is the quintessential Romantic-realist, conditioned to know all things tangible, all things personable to Man, a quality he feels absent in the God only present in “silent shadows.” Stevens discerns that we are simply kinesthetic creatures, yearning for a concrete truth. His last resort—truth within Man, “divinity within herself,” a steadfast, secure theology. Though he sees no loyalty in the Creator, he still searches for someone, someone to “walk naked among [us].”
Finally, Stevens comes to the conclusion that if holiness does stem from “April's green,” then what justifies man to inquire about such myths as “Jove” and “his inhuman birth?” Foolishness is what drives us, overriding the “sweet berries,” that “ripen” within the heap of the “wilderness.” We simply are not content. We crave the “haunt of prophecy,”the mysteries, temptations of recovering the cryptic clues and formulas to finally reach the “paradise,” meet the “Spirits lingering,” gain a “heavenly fellowship,” but Earth—this “paradise” is all “we shall know.” Acceptance is the only duty we are commanded to proclaim.
Nevertheless, how is the truth so veiled to you and me when the “echoing hills,” who from time to time, “choir among themselves,” and give notion that they are, indeed, present in man's life, fully ready to “chant in orgy” with us?
Overall, man should not “test the reality,” rather, consider its intrinsic value. Trivializing the heavenliness in all things tangible is the fall of mankind.
3.26.2009
The Crane Wife
The Decemberists - 14 The Crane Wife part1 | ||
Found at skreemr.com |
3.25.2009
The Silent Raconteur
The Silent Raconteur
Tender feet, so distressed
After a day of swiveling limbs
Threadbare, he reaches for a quilt,
Regarding hands too weak to to stretch
Somber eyes, memories seen
Never once asked to tell
Reaching for the bandage, it's swelled
Dressing his wounds clean
Next time Grandpa Joe has something on his mind, listen. Odds are it's a damn good story to hear. Those scars you see, veiling his brow, hands, knees, body, tell times of his past, yearning to be discovered.
First, It should be noted that I was only three paragraphs into “A Piece of Steak,” when I became inspired to write a poem, vividly telling of a man so predisposed in the past, but forced to forget and fast-forward to the current. It has absolutely no relevancy to the actual story, told by Jack London, though I'm sure it is possible to correlate between the two ambiguously.
The poem primarily incorporates symbolism and allegory to denote that he is not only just a weary, reserved man, but one who, in his youth, could have suffered trauma. His “tender feet” (1) are worked after years of manual labor. The reason why “tender” was used is to juxtapose a child to this elderly man, explaining the revolution man makes as he is born, matures, grows old, and finally reverts back to a childlike mentality. His heart and mind are impressionable like that of a young boy.
Simultaneously, he is calloused and cannot feel emotion as he once did. His “somber eyes” allow him to see through a mesh screen, netting visions that remind him of “memories seen.” (5) To contradict a statement above, he is neglected, just as some of the elderly are when their bodies don't allow them to participate in activities they once could have. He is independent, “threadbare” and keeps himself warm with a measly “quilt.” (3) He “dress[es] his own “wounds,” and forbids himself of bringing up the past. He “clean[s]” the dirt from his cuts and scrapes. (8)Though the dirt may render morose memories, it should not be cached; for, it could cause infection. It should be sifted to the surface and removed so that it couldn't harm him in the future, haunt him without news.
It's a shame that “bandages” (7) cover his untold tales of the past. From what it seems like, these stories are yearning for a voice to recount them. They are “swelled,” constantly reminding him of the secrecy. (8) Unfortunately, no one has inquired about “The Silent Raconteur's” past, but his age and distress only make his undivulged history a burden to his spirit.
3.23.2009
Bless Me Father, For I Have Sinned?
2.25.2009
Ignorant-Thinkers
Let's start by addressing that I am, indeed, a devout Agnostic. My theories of a god-like figure vary and I am content with my inconsistency. At the moment, I don't believe in God, no; however, ask me tomorrow, after I've experienced a surreal coincidence and I might contradict myself. I won't subscribe to the whole Atheistic cult, because really, who knows if there is a metaphysical being? I think humans are ignorant for either stating complete and utter belief in an invisible creator and too full of themselves for denying blind faith. Why do you have to choose one over the other? Humans know nothing. You will never learn the meaning of life. Your pastor is fatuously respected when he is only man-weak, stupid, selfish. Then again, the Atheist you met on the plane last week-he's nothing, but a fraud who thinks he's deciphered the world's mystery.
Another thing: if we are going to get into the lifestyles of the religious, I just have to flat-out admit that all of them are hypocrites, namely the die-hard. Terrorism, for example, is NOT a religious matter. I was raised within a Muslim family, my grandfather prays five times per day, and practices the five-pillars without hesitation. That, my friend, is devotion. I say this, though with hesitation because he is only human, nothing special, just flesh. Though it is completely ridiculous for him to subscribe to a specific sect, I still give him kudos for practicing with as little contradiction as humanly possible. Al-Quaeda, on the other hand, has no clue who Allah is and claim to be destructing His precious Earth in His name. This is not religion, my friend, this is humiliation to the rest of the Islamic population, it demolishes the reputation of innocent, passionate Muslims. Don't ever believe a journalist, a documentarist referring to terrorism as a religious sacrifice, and last time I checked, human sacrifice was nowhere to be found within the binds of the Koran. I find this bullshit and offensive.
Plain stated: I don't care what religion you follow. If your life runs the way you please, then by all means, continue doing whatever it is makes you happy. Just let me live mine and we can all attempt to live in some sort of harmony.
"We're Persian, Like the Cat. MEOW!"
I was in D.C. a few days ago and walked past the usual rallies and activists, but this one caught my eye-it was my kin! About 20 or 30 Iranians were gathered, side-by-side, behind typical posters and pickets demonstrating. One looked like my Uncle Navid, another reminded me of my cousin Sholeh, I felt at home, so I stepped forward to inquire. I found this one poster with a caricature of President Ahmadinejad, looking as if he had had a few too many shots of Whiskey and like always, scruffy, filthy-looking. A cannon was drawn through Mr. President's head and beneath it was written "Ahmadi Nejad Does Not Represent the Iranian People!" I didn't want to admit that I was Persian to the others, I never do, an instead, I stand around listening to what they're saying about non-speakers (Thank goodness I look white). I heard my-Uncle-Navid-looking-one tell the other guy to smooth back his hair because I was taking a picture and another girl told her sister that I had cute shoes :D. It was really cool-finally someone stood up for my home country. Iran is a beautiful, cultural place, a relatively unexplored land; we're classy people, and no, we have no affiliation with Al-Quaeda, come on!
2.21.2009
College Talk
Just got back from a jam-packed weekend of college tours. SO tired, but SO pleased.
Appalachian State University, Boone, NC
What a breathtaking campus. I mean really, what college campus is electrically independent from its own town, powered by steam?
This is by far one of the more "green" schools I've visited. The trees seemed to touch the sky and the snow was barely trickling down.
The school is in the super small town, called Boone.
The entire community is just about made up of college students and alum. My favorite spot was this coffee shop called BeansTalk.
First off, the little shack looks as if it was a work of art itself. You walk into a 10x20 room (most of it is a just coffee table and cash deck)
and order your modest latte (no frappaccino's here), have a little conversation with the coffee guy about the newest band to hit the streets of Boone,
or maybe about the nature hike scheduled for next week, grab your cup, and either plant it in the claustrophobic area downstairs,
or head to a loft up above with a sweetie or a friend.
You can tell that every student just adores being a student there. No doubt. I mean, you really have to have a lot in common with your
classmates for choosing this hidden wonder over the thousands of the colleges in the country. That's what I love about it, every student
loves the wilderness, the frigid conditions, the peaceful social life. Truly, the quintessential mountain village.
The George Washington University, Washington D.C.
I thought my future was in the Blue Ridge Mountains until I got to GW, then I found myself completely frustrated and torn.
Okay, you're thinking rural village to urban metropolis, but really, this community in the heart of D.C. is a city within a city. The community is
so close-knit, but turn the corner and you're at the White House, two steps back and you're walking the cobblestones of Georgetown.
This place has culture. If you love meeting people of various ethnicities and learning foreign languages, I highly suggest it.
What I love the most is every building of the school is designed so differently than the next. Sure, this school is old, but its history is
what you should be curious about. Some buildings are really modern and trendy, but if you get sick of all that contemporary stuff,
your next class is in a brick building with a staircase built a hundred years ago. The diversity is mesmerizing and the people
you will meet there will teach you about a world you never knew. I already met some students and prospective students, just like me,
who are waiting for an experience like GW to really open their eyes and show them how big this world really is.
And think about this, there are more internships at GW than there are students, you won't go hungry! And for a writer, like myself,
this place is in the hub of journalism and all things writing. Seriously, don't think twice about another school.
Two incredible schools, one difficult decision-which one do I choose?!